Web 2.0 Stereotypes

Deja vu, is there a glitch in the Web 2.0 Matrix? Phil Pearson has noticed it:

“OK guys, this is going too far. Not ALL of the following are required for a web 2.0-style application/site:

– Name that consists of a number and a word. (37signals did it for their company, and 43places did it for their site. That’s enough.)

– Blatant rip off of font and style from everything from 37signals.

– Ruby on Rails. (PHP is good enough for Flickr, remember).

– Yellow background appearing then fading out whenever something changes.

– Submit buttons that grey out and say “please wait” when you click them.”

What other Web 2.0 stereotypes can you think of? Here are some suggestions to kick it off:

– Tag clouds

– RSS Aggregators with ‘rss’ or ‘feed’ in their name

– Logos with the same color scheme as Google’s

– Using the word ‘beta’

– Social bookmarking sites that look exactly like del.icio.us

– No one from Google that blogs (thanks Ben Barren for that one!)

Feel free to add your suggestions in the comments…

Originally published on ReadWriteWeb (archived copy)

Consulting

Make your site AI-ready

I help publishers and tech companies adapt to the agentic web — from AI discoverability to on-site assistants and Web AI strategy.

Explore consulting →