---
title: "post.icio.us update"
date: 2005-05-04
author: "Richard MacManus"
categories:
  - name: "ReadWriteWeb"
    url: "/category/readwriteweb.md"
tags:
  - name: "2005"
    url: "/tag/2005.md"
---

# post.icio.us update

Based on the great comments I received to [post.icio.us](https://web.archive.org/web/20060508061952/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002704.php) a week ago, I’ve been doing some experimenting on R/WW. First I tried out the [‘5 links to a post’ style](https://web.archive.org/web/20060508061952/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002710.php) (again). I don’t think it worked, for me or for you. So now what I’m going to do is the “mini-analysis” style that [Andrew Chen](https://web.archive.org/web/20060508061952/http://www.andrewsw.com/)[suggested](https://web.archive.org/web/20060508061952/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002704.php#000887). I did one earlier today, called [Pulling the pieces together](https://web.archive.org/web/20060508061952/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002711.php), and for some reason I was pleased as punch that I managed to get my point across in only 3 paragraphs! 😉

So I’ll keep doing that. I’ll continue to use the ‘2.0 News’ brand and icon, which will be ‘tagged’ onto any post that is short ‘n sweet and Web 2.0 news.

*Originally published on ReadWriteWeb ([archived copy](https://web.archive.org/web/20020204040018/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/posticious_upda.php))*