---
title: "Feedburner and Blog-Centered Stats"
date: 2004-10-19
author: "Richard MacManus"
categories:
  - name: "ReadWriteWeb"
    url: "/category/readwriteweb.md"
tags:
  - name: "2004"
    url: "/tag/2004.md"
---

# Feedburner and Blog-Centered Stats

As a follow-up to [my previous post](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002343.php), I decided to take the plunge and sign up with [Feedburner](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/home) (hat tip to [Cristian](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.cristianvidmar.com/2004/10/14.html#a293)!). Feedburner is a third-party service that generates an enhanced RSS feed for you. What’s enhanced about it? For starters it enables you to track RSS statistics for *all* RSS Aggregators (not just Bloglines). Feedburner does much more too – e.g. it has a “browser-friendly” option that hides the XML code from users and it lets you splice in Flickr photos or del.icio.us links to your RSS feed. Feedburner is a great service, packed with features, but there is a trade-off…

Basically I’ve handed over control of my RSS feed to a third party, mainly so I can get some decent stats. I’m not overly comfortable with a third-party hosting my RSS feed, but then the decentralized content model is getting more and more acceptable on the Web (I use [Flickr](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricmac/) and [del.icio.us](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://del.icio.us/readwriteweb) now too).

I want to reiterate that Bloglines subscriber stats has a pretty large margin of error. As I said in my previous post, some people have a variety of RSS/Atom feeds associated with 1 blog. Bloglines only tracks each feed individually. In fact I myself have some subscribers on a little-known RSS 1.0 feed I have – and those subscribers don’t show up in the Subscriber stats for my main RSS 2.0 feed.

Now that I have a Feedburner RSS feed, that situation will get worse because now I have a *third* RSS feed associated with this blog. I configured it so that Feedburner tracks them all as 1, which is the correct way to do it. Bloglines, by tracking each of my 3 feeds separately, is fragmenting my reader statistics.

Put another way – Feedburner takes a **blog-centered** approach to stats-tracking, while Bloglines takes a **feed-centered** approach. I much prefer blog-centered, as it’s a fairer reflection of how many people subscribe to your content. I’ve emailed [Bloglines Support](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.bloglines.com/) to ask if they can fix this situation and provide an aggregate count of subscribers for any one blog – no matter how many different feeds it has.

It’s too early to discuss what my trends are in [Feedburner](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/home), but I will write about it later. If you want to try Feedburner out, MT users can follow the instructions [here](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.burningdoor.com/feedburner/archives/000425.html) and [here](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.burningdoor.com/feedburner/archives/000478.html). For Radio users, [Cristian](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.cristianvidmar.com/) sent me a couple of very informative emails that hopefully he’ll post on his weblog.

**Update:** Great minds think alike. [Jason Fried also](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.37signals.com/svn/archives/000896.php) has a post about Feedburner today and he lists some other benefits – including that it requires no change on the reader side and it takes the RSS load off your web server. Plus Dick Costolo from Feedburner points in the comments to [a handy FAQ](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.burningdoor.com/feedburner/archives/000688.html).

[Permalink](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002350.php) | [TrackBack \[1\]](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.readwriteweb.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=2350) | [bloglines](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.bloglines.com/citations?url=http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002350.php "find related discussion on bloglines") | [feedster](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://feedster.com/links.php?url=http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002350.php "find related discusion on feedster") | [technorati](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002350.php "find related discusion on technorati") | [digger](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.blogdigger.com/linkSearch.jsp?link=http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002350.php "find related discusion on blogdigger")

<a name="comments"></a><a name="000502"></a>

## \# 1

Posted by [Andrew](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.readwriteweb.com/mt/mt-comments.cgi?__mode=red;id=502 "http://www.andrewsw.com/news/") at [October 19, 2004 05:54 PM](https://web.archive.org/web/20050213045154/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002350.php#000502)

**Comments for this post are now closed.**

*Originally published on ReadWriteWeb ([archived copy](https://web.archive.org/web/20020204040018/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002350.php))*